Grove v. Juul Labs, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that party who does not seek relief from court until college selection process has been completed \may have waived his or her right to object to the college and its concomitant cost\
• “The college expense provisions [of the settlement agreement] thus contemplate an interactive process regarding the selection of each child’s college”
• “in the event of disagreement . . . each party would be responsible for fifty percent of the cost of reasonable college expenses”
• A separation agreement must be interpreted \in accord with justice and common sense and the probable intention of the parties\ [quotation omitted]
• father earning approximately $100,000 per year claimed that he and the child’s mother “both attended public universities and never intended the college expense provisions to require payment of private university expenses”
• “a party who has sat on his or her right to intervene, or to seek approval from the court when the parties disagree, until the college selection process has been completed, may have waived his or her right to object to the college and its concomitant cost”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).