Grout v. Cottrell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that attempted Hobbs Act robbery does not qualify as a crime of violence under the elements clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)
• holding that Section 924(c)(3)’s elements clause “precludes . . . an inquiry into how any particular defendant may commit the crime.”
• holding that attempted Hobbs Act robbery is not a “crime of violence” under the elements clause
• holding that attempted Hobbs Act robbery does not categorically qualify as a crime of violence under § 924(c)
• holding that attempted Hobbs Act robbery is not categorically a crime of violence that can serve as a predicate offense for a § 924(c) conviction
• holding that attempted Hobbs Act robbery does not qualify as a crime of violence under the elements clause of statutory definition of crime of violence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).