Skip to main content
· 5/4/1993

Group Health, Inc. v. Heuer

Citations

  • 499 N.W.2d 526
  • 1993 Minn. App. LEXIS 486
  • 1993 WL 138147

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that notice, which is generally a question of fact to be decided by the fact-finder, becomes one of law when only one inference is possible from undisputed facts
  • discussing what type of notice of an asserted subrogation claim is required to find willful disregard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parker, Amundson, Mulally

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.