Group Health Co-Op. v. City of Seattle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that city could not avoid preemption of tax on HMO that served as both carrier and provider under section 8909(f) “by unilaterally recharac-terizing” HMO “as a health care ‘provider’ rather than a carrier”
• noting that city could not avoid preemption of tax on HMO that served as both carrier and provider under section 8909(f) “by 14 unilaterally recharacterizing” HMO “as a health care ‘provider’ rather than a carrier”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).