Ground Zero Construction, Inc. v. Walnut Creek, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that four-month period of time between State’s initial petition and filing of petition to transfer was not unreasonable delay and satisfied due-diligence element of Section 54.02(j)
• holding juvenile court did not abuse discretion in waiving jurisdiction and entering second transfer order where sufficient evidence supported juvenile court’s challenged 52.04(j) findings
• holding juvenile court did not abuse discretion in waiving jurisdiction and entering second transfer order where sufficient evidence supported juvenile court’s challenged 52.04(j) findings
• affirming due diligence finding where second transfer hearing was held eight months after remand
• affirming due diligence finding where second transfer hearing was held eight months after remand
• where statute permitted procedure, fact that State followed procedure could not be evidence of lack of due diligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).