Grotnes v. Grotnes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[W]e held that contempt was not an appropriate or available remedy as it would constitute imprisonment for debt. We still believe this to be true in the normal debtor-creditor situation.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gibson v. Bennett
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-05-10· cited 53×
• Morin v. Morin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-04-12· cited 9×
• Kutz v. Fankhanel
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-10-23· cited 8×
• Illinois Commerce Commission v. Salamie
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-10-20· cited 5×
• Kozlik v. Kozlik
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-06-16· cited 3×
• Pretot v. Pretot
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1995-09-15· cited 2×
• Bennett v. Gibson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-08-14· cited 2×
• Zamperla v. Pope
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-08-16
• Al Ghurair v. Zaczac
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-09-20

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sackler v. Sackler
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1950-06-23· cited 60×
• Haas v. Haas
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1952-06-17· cited 37×
• Lanigan v. Lanigan
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1955-02-16· cited 21×
• State Ex Rel. Byrd v. Anderson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1964-11-17· cited 13×
• West v. West
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-10-23· cited 10×
• Graham v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1962-08-31· cited 10×
• Courtney v. Warner
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-02-22· cited 9×
• Ginsberg v. Ginsberg
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1960-09-19· cited 7×
• Miller v. Miller
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1958-10-02· cited 6×
• State Ex Rel. Clark v. Muldrew
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-02-14· cited 1×