Skip to main content
· 12/26/1984

Groth v. Sandoz, Inc.

Citations

  • 601 F. Supp. 453
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20967

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that when plaintiff was not diagnosed until after statute of repose had extinguished her claim, any alleged concealment did not deprive plaintiff of opportunity to preserve or pursue her claim
  • “[Plaintiff’s ‘fraud’ cause of action is unsupported in the record by any specific allegations of fraudulent conduct and is substantively nothing more than a restatement of plaintiffs strict liability, negligence and breach of warranty causes of action grounded in product liability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schatz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.