· 12/27/2012
Grote Industries, LLC v. Sebelius
Citations
- 914 F. Supp. 2d 943
- 2012 WL 6725905
- 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181965
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- locomotive was “in use” because the “activities of [the plaintiff] came after the excluded activities of inspection, servicing and repair had been completed”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.