Grosvenor v. Florida Commission on Offender Review

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding standing for terminated marketing director and observing that it is unlikely any other victim had the same incentive to “bring the antitrust violators to account”
• no one else had as strong an interest as discharged employee in vindicating public interest in antitrust enforcement
• no one else had as strong an interest as discharged employee in vindicating public interest in antitrust enforcement
• though neither a consumer nor competitor in the relevant market, fact that injury to plaintiff was a necessary means to achieve the conspirators' illegal end sufficient to establish antitrust injury
• it is “virtually impossible to announce a black-letter rule that will dictate a result in every case. Instead, previously decided cases identify factors that circumscribe and guide the exercise of judgment in deciding whether the law affords a remedy in specific circumstances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).