Grosso v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred in modifying probation to include electronic monitoring outside the sixty-day period specified in Rule 3.800(c
• recognizing trial court lacks jurisdiction to modify conditions of probation after expiration of sixty-day period in rule 3.800(c), which allows court to “.reduce or modify to include any of the provisions of chapter 948, Florida Statutes, a legal sentence imposed by it”
• “The legality of a sentence is a question of law and is subject to de novo review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).