Skip to main content
· 12/19/2006

Grosso v. Federal Express Corp.

Citations

  • 467 F. Supp. 2d 449
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91604
  • 2006 WL 3759714

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a reasonable jury could conclude an employer discouraged an employee from taking FMLA leave after encouraging the employee to pursue other options, such as placing his father in a nursing home
  • relying on Lewis and holding that an employer could not shorten the time in which an employee could bring a FMLA claim
  • distinguishing a case that had upheld a shortened period of limitations as “inapposite to this case, where the right at issue is not contractual, but rather is a federal statutory right”
  • applying § 5501 in the context of an employment contract dispute
  • “Thus, this Court concludes that Burlington Northern provides guidance in determining whether plaintiff was subject to an “adverse employment action [under the FMLA]”
  • 6-month contractual agreement unreasonable and unenforceable with regard to FMLA retaliation claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: DuBOIS

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.