Skip to main content
· 1/22/1979

Grossmann v. Redington

Citations

  • 439 U.S. 1128
  • 99 S. Ct. 1045

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Without the complete formulae, plaintiffs will be foreclosed from presenting all the relevant evidence in support of their position.”
  • \[T]he Company possesses trade secrets which have been carefully safeguarded and which are extremely valuable. It is also evident that any disclosure of those trade secrets would be harmful to the Company.\
  • “differences in the public ingredients, including sweeteners, cannot be understood unless they are put in context through disclosure of the similarities and differences in the secret ingredients”
  • “[O]nce the information is shown to be a trade secret], the burden shifts to the party seeking discovery to establish that the disclosure of trade secrets is relevant and necessary to the action.”
  • Coca-Cola formulae deemed trade secrets subject to protective order
  • Coca-Cola formulae deemed trade secrets subject to protective order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.