Grossman v. Barke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the FCA “mandat[es] the imposition of treble damages”
• upholding a judgment of “$1.179 million based on $755.54 in actual damages” where the Court imposed the minimum penalty for each of 214 FCA violations
• “if the trial court’s ruling is tentative or without prejudice, there is no definitive ruling on the objection”
• “In the context of the FCA, we also consider the deterrent effect of a monetary award [in considering proportionality].”
• “Significantly, the relator cannot dismiss her qui tam action unless the United States consents in writing.”
• “[T]he United States is not a formal party to a non-intervened qui tam action ….” (citing Eisenstein)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).