Grossberg v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the evidence was insufficient to prove that appellant did not intend to pay for the lumber he received
• holding that where the evidence was insufficient to sustain the appellant’s conviction, this Court was constrained to reverse the judgment of sentence and discharge the appellant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).