Grossbaum Ceramic Art Syndicate v. German Insurance

Citations

• 213 Pa. 506
• 62 A. 1107
• 1906 Pa. LEXIS 518

Syllabus

<p>Insurance — Contract—Oral contract — Charge—Adequacy of charge.</p> <p>In an action upon a parol contract of insurance, known as an “oral binder,” the purpose of which is to cover property from the time of the application until the policy is issued, it appeared that the evidence was contradictory as to whether such a contract existed, and the trial court in a' charge which the Supreme Court held not to be inadequate, misleading, unfair, or argumentative, submitted the case to the jury, and a verdict and judgment for the defendant was returned, which on appeal was affirmed.</p>