Skip to main content
· 2/1/2000

Gross v. King David Bistro, Inc.

Citations

  • 84 F. Supp. 2d 675
  • 53 Fed. R. Serv. 868
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4745
  • 2000 WL 151142

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that similar epidemiological investigation “provided persuasive scientific support” to infer that infections were caused by eating same menu item but that opinions about who or what caused item to be tainted were “untrustworthy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Motz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.