Skip to main content
· 4/5/1988

Gross v. Hoyt

Citations

  • 1 Pa. D. & C.4th 490
  • 1988 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 85

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Petitioner cannot avail himself of ORS 138.550(3)’s escape clause merely because [there may have been] additional or superior information to support a Brady claim that was already reasonably available to petitioner during his first post-conviction proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fornelli

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.