Groshans v. Dairyland Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the Third District \found that Illinois law [did] not require actual physical contact but merely permit[ted] an insurance policy to require such contact\
• the Third District “found that Illinois law [did] not require actual physical contact but merely permit[ted] an insurance policy to require such contact”
• \Illinois law does not require actual physical contact [for hit-and-run coverage] but merely permits an insurance policy to require such contact\ (emphases added)
• \Illinois law does not require actual physical contact [for hit-and-run coverage] but merely permits an insurance policy to require such contact\ (emphases added)
• “Illinois law does not require actual physical contact [for hit-and-run coverage] but merely permits an insurance policy to require such contact” (emphases added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).