Groseclose v. Optimum Oncology-Comprehensive Cancer Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the disappointed bidder failed to provide “any factual basis” to establish the existence of an organizational conflict of interest
• holding that the disappointed bidder failed to provide “any factual basis” to establish the existence of an OCI
• holding that the disappointed bidder failed to provide “any factual basis” to establish the existence of an OCI
• noting that the urgency justification cannot support more than the minimum quantity and time needed to satisfy immediate urgent requirements
• holding the disappointed bidder failed to provide “any factual basis” to establish the existence of an OCI
• finding that the identification of the OCI did not occur as early in the acquisition process as possible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).