Skip to main content
· 6/23/2006

Gros v. Holmes

Citations

  • 930 So. 2d 981
  • 2006 La. LEXIS 2052
  • 2006 WL 1736134

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • test for whether juror misconduct merits new trial is whether misconduct prejudiced defendant to extent that defendant has not received fair trial
  • not improper for court to ask if juror’s ability to determine defendant’s guilt or innocence affected by knowledge that juror’s friend might be defendant’s friend
  • [t]he trial court is vested with wide discretion in determining the competency of jurors to serve, and that judgment will not be disturbed absent a showing of an abuse of discretion
  • only nine days between the crime and the identification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.