Gropper v. Home Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff could not recover both for “the diminution of rental value of the premises during a time when they were occupied by plaintiff himself” and for “the physical discomforts and pain of plaintiff and his family during the same period”
• upholding recovery for the destruction of the plaintiff’s trees and for sickness in his family caused by the nuisance
• acknowledging claim for expenses “on account of sickness in his family caused by the nuisance”
• granting new trial as to damages caused by fertilizer plant built next to plaintiffs property on ground that plaintiff could not recover for both diminution of value and discomfort

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).