Groom v. Professionals Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because plaintiffs addition of parties to medical malpractice action was not based on mistaken identities, amended complaint did not relate back to original complaint
• holding that because plaintiff's addition of parties to medical malpractice action was not based on mistaken identities, amended complaint did not relate back to original complaint
• \A party is bound by the acts of her lawyer-agent and has notice of all facts in the possession of her attorney.\
• \A party is bound by the acts of her lawyer-agent and has notice of all the facts in the possession of her attorney.\
• \A party is bound by the acts of her lawyer-agent and has notice of all the facts in the possession of her attorney.\
• where only one inference can reasonably be drawn from undisputed facts, court may decide issue as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).