Groner v. Miller (In Re Miller)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that section 362(a) does not empower bankruptcy courts to stay proceedings 21 against non-debtor defendants
• holding that a post-petition third-party subpoena to a debtor and the seeking of a sanction against that debtor for failure to comply with the subpoenas did not offend the automatic stay
• holding that the automatic stay did not preclude the debtor from participating in discovery requests pertaining to claims against non-debtor defendant and basing decision on section 362 of the Code only
• holding that a post-petition third-party subpoena to a debtor and the seeking of a sanction against that debtor for failure to comply with the subpoenas did not offend the automatic stay
• holding that discovery “as part of the development of a case against non-debtor parties is permissible, even if that information could later be used against the party protected by the automatic stay”
• holding 21 that section 362(a) does not empower bankruptcy courts to stay proceedings against non-debtor 22 defendants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).