Skip to main content
· 9/14/1973

Gromling v. Lazenby

Citations

  • 282 So. 2d 883
  • 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 8549

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because duration of lease was ambiguous on its face, parol evidence would be properly admitted to resolve such ambiguity and explain the parties’ intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.