Grolbert v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that there was no due process violation because “the court conducted a lengthy hearing[,] ... questioned [the witness], and also invoked the assistance of a child psychiatrist” (emphasis added)
• rejecting claim that the admission of a child witness’s testimony violated due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).