Groh v. Ballard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \[a] standard rule of statutory construction is that the express mention of one thing implies the exclusion of another\
• holding that “[a] standard rule of statutory construction is that the express mention of one thing implies the exclusion of another.”
• holding that “[a] standard rule of statutory construction is that the express mention of one thing implies the exclusion of another.”
• holding that legislature’s express mention of fraud, duress, undue influence, and murder as reasons for voiding a beneficiary deed under the Nonprobate Transfers Law imply that it did not intend the owner’s unilateral mistake to be deemed a cause of remedial action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).