Skip to main content
· 12/11/2002

Grogan v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue Department

Citations

  • 62 P.3d 1236
  • 133 N.M. 354
  • 2003 NMCA 033

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming a hearing officer’s determination that the agreements between the retail store owner and the cigarette manufacturers were licenses because the representatives of the manufacturer did not have exclusive possession over their counter and shelf displays
  • “A retailer who is reimbursed the discounted amount does not absorb the cash loss. Such a retailer is in no position to claim a[ tax] exclusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sutin, Alarid, Fry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.