· 2/1/1977
Groebner v. State
Citations
- 342 So. 2d 94
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding improper remarks of prosecutor were of such character that neither objection nor curative instruction could entirely destroy their sinister influence; mistrial motion should have been granted
- holding improper remarks of prosecutor were of such character that neither objection nor curative instruction could entirely destroy their sinister influence; mistrial motion should have been granted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pearson, Haverfield and Nathan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.