Grody v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[i]t is not within the province of [the courts] to expand or contract the meaning of a statute by reading into it language which will ... correct any supposed omissions or defects therein”
• court “will not consider the abstract question of whether Congress might have enacted a valid statute but instead must ask whether the statute Congress did enact will permissibly bear a construction rendering it free from constitutional defects”
• If a statute has a plain meaning, it must be given effect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Baldwin v. Reagan
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1999-07-06· cited 123×
• Indiana Wholesale Wine & Liquor Co. v. State Ex Rel. Indiana Alcoholic Beverage Commission
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1998-05-28· cited 88×
• State v. Marley
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1973-05-04· cited 86×
• Rogers v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1979-11-05· cited 67×
• Grody v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1972-02-10· cited 63×
• Bader v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2000-03-30· cited 62×
• State v. Baysinger
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1979-12-03· cited 59×
• State v. American Family Voices, Inc.
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2008-12-23· cited 58×
• Indiana State Highway Commission v. White
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1973-01-19· cited 55×
• Caylor-Nickel Clinic, P.C. v. Indiana Department of State Revenue
  Indiana Tax Court· 1991-04-04· cited 48×
• Brown v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2009-09-10· cited 45×
• Burks v. Bolerjack
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1981-11-10· cited 44×
• United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Hanley
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1977-02-28· cited 38×
• A.E.B. v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2001-10-03· cited 37×
• Scott Weigle v. SPX Corporation
  Seventh Circuit· 2013-09-06· cited 32×
• State v. Martinez
  Washington Supreme Court· 1975-07-24· cited 30×
• Hess v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1973-05-22· cited 30×
• Brownsburg Area Patrons Affecting Change v. Baldwin
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1999-06-23· cited 28×
• A Woman's Choice-East Side Women's Clinic v. Newman
  S.D. Indiana· 1995-11-09· cited 24×
• State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Mixmill Manufacturing Co.
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1999-02-05· cited 23×

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Cantwell v. Connecticut
  Supreme Court· 1940-05-20· cited 3,669×
• Connally v. General Construction Co.
  Supreme Court· 1926-01-04· cited 3,272×
• National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Button
  Supreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 3,080×
• Thornhill v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 1940-04-22· cited 2,351×
• Dombrowski v. Pfister
  Supreme Court· 1965-04-26· cited 2,255×
• Haguer v. Committee for Industrial Organization
  Supreme Court· 1939-06-05· cited 2,178×
• Cohen v. California
  Supreme Court· 1971-06-07· cited 1,777×
• Shelton v. Tucker
  Supreme Court· 1960-12-12· cited 1,729×
• Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY
  Supreme Court· 1966-10-17· cited 1,655×
• Cox v. Louisiana
  Supreme Court· 1965-01-18· cited 1,449×
• Lovell v. City of Griffin
  Supreme Court· 1938-03-28· cited 1,301×
• Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham
  Supreme Court· 1969-03-10· cited 1,269×
• Coates v. City of Cincinnati
  Supreme Court· 1971-06-01· cited 1,269×
• Smith v. California
  Supreme Court· 1960-06-13· cited 1,258×
• Baggett v. Bullitt
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-01· cited 1,188×
• Edwards v. South Carolina
  Supreme Court· 1963-02-25· cited 931×
• Adderley v. Florida
  Supreme Court· 1966-11-14· cited 876×
• Aptheker v. Secretary of State
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 709×
• Niemotko v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1951-01-15· cited 563×
• Kunz v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1951-01-15· cited 517×