Skip to main content
· 8/23/2007

Grochocinski v. LaSalle Bank National Ass'n (In Re K & R Express Systems, Inc.)

Citations

  • 382 B.R. 443
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62878
  • 2007 WL 2461672

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “permissive withdrawal is the exception, rather than the rule, as bankruptcy jurisdiction is ‘designed to provide a single forum for dealing with all claims to the bankrupt’s assets.’”
  • “The law is clear in this circuit that such an action constitutes consent to the equitable jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court and thus effects a “waiver’ of the right to a jury trial.”
  • action for unjust enrichment is legal in nature because money judgment sought
  • courts have broad discretion in deciding if there is cause for permissive withdrawal
  • withdrawing reference because right to jury trial was clear

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James B. Moran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.