· 8/23/2007
Grochocinski v. LaSalle Bank National Ass'n (In Re K & R Express Systems, Inc.)
Citations
- 382 B.R. 443
- 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62878
- 2007 WL 2461672
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “permissive withdrawal is the exception, rather than the rule, as bankruptcy jurisdiction is ‘designed to provide a single forum for dealing with all claims to the bankrupt’s assets.’”
- “The law is clear in this circuit that such an action constitutes consent to the equitable jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court and thus effects a “waiver’ of the right to a jury trial.”
- action for unjust enrichment is legal in nature because money judgment sought
- courts have broad discretion in deciding if there is cause for permissive withdrawal
- withdrawing reference because right to jury trial was clear
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: James B. Moran
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.