Groceman v. United States Department of Justice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “like fingerprinting, collection of a DNA sample for purposes of identification implicates the Fourth Amendment, [and] persons incarcerated after conviction retain no constitutional privacy interest against their correct identification
• “Though, like fingerprinting, collection of a DNA sample for purposes of identification implicates the Fourth Amendment, persons incarcerated after conviction retain no constitutional privacy against their correct identification.”
• “Though, like fingerprinting, collection of a DNA sample for purposes of identification implicates the Fourth Amendment, persons incarcerated after conviction retain no constitutional privacy interest against their correct identifica- tion.”
• “Though, like fingerprinting, collection of a DNA sample for purposes of identification implicates the Fourth Amendment, persons incarcerated after conviction retain no constitutional privacy interest against their correct identifica- tion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).