Skip to main content
· 11/27/2013

Groark v. Timek

Citations

  • 989 F. Supp. 2d 378
  • 2013 WL 6199187
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168716

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “If [the allegation that the defendant conspired to violate plaintiffs constitutional rights] is proven to be true, it is conduct that cannot be within the scope of [the tribal official’s] authority.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schneider

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.