· 6/3/2008
Grizzell v. Department of Business & Professional
Citations
- 982 So. 2d 1266
- 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 8529
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding harm, among other reasons, because state repeatedly emphasized improp- erly admitted evidence in its closing argument
- finding harm, in relevant part, because state repeatedly emphasized improperly admitted evidence in its closing argument
- finding harm because, among other reasons, state repeatedly emphasized improperly admit- ted evidence during its closing argument
- finding harm because, among other reasons, state repeatedly emphasized improperly admit- ted evidence during its closing argument
- finding harm, in relevant part, because state repeatedly empha- sized improperly admitted evidence in its closing argu- ment
- “our holdings in sexual assault cases that prior sexual misconduct is viewed more liberally than other types of prior misconduct should not be disturbed”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Griffin, Monaco, Orfinger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.