Skip to main content
· 2/20/1997

Griswold v. Fresenius USA, Inc.

Citations

  • 964 F. Supp. 1166
  • 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3741
  • 75 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 467
  • 1997 WL 272357

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that under Paroline, an agent of a corporate employer is directly liable under Title VII but stating that \the continuing viability of that holding has been called into doubt\
  • holding an individual employee may be hable under section 4112.99
  • limiting application of Kerans to its facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Katz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.