Grissom v. Union Pac. R. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claim was for injunctive relief, not monetary damages, for 23(b)(2) purposes, where plaintiffs asked the court to restore them to their positions prior to a merger, with restitution of benefits and back pay
• finding that a claim was for injunctive relief, not monetary damages, for 23(b)(2) purposes, where plaintiffs requested the court to restore them to their positions prior to a merger, including back pay and restitution of benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).