Grisso v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence that plaintiff received compensation for an earlier injury, which ordinarily would have been irrelevant and prejudicial, was admissible to impeach plaintiff’s testimony that his earlier injury had not impaired him
• holding that evidence that plaintiff received compensation for an earlier injury, which ordinarily would have been irrelevant and prejudicial, was admissible to impeach plaintiff’s testimony that his earlier injury had not impaired him
• “A trial court, in its discretion, may admit evidence relevant to the issue of impeachment even if the evidence would not qualify for admission on other grounds.”
• “A trial court, in its discretion may 13 admit evidence relevant to the issue of impeachment even if the evidence would not qualify for admission on other grounds.”
• “A trial court, in its discretion may 13 admit evidence relevant to the issue of impeachment even if the evidence would not qualify for admission on other grounds.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).