Skip to main content
· 10/7/2009

Grisham v. Philip Morris, Inc.

Citations

  • 670 F. Supp. 2d 1014
  • 70 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 489
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112914
  • 2009 WL 4019366

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Fox’s description of 5 the pleading-stage test for the discovery rule applies equally to summary judgment if the 6 evidentiary burden is modified appropriately
  • declining to apply nonmutual offensive issue preclusion as plaintiff failed to specifically show how the 2,600 findings at issue from the DOJ Case were necessary to the judgment
  • “[S]ummary judgment is rarely proper where the statute of limitations runs from when 15 plaintiff discovered or should have discovered the element of the cause of action.” (citation 16 omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.