Skip to main content
· 1/3/1995

Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company v. Dieter Reinke, Joseph Wickes, Administrator of the Estate of Charles A. Bittner

Citations

  • 43 F.3d 1152
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14
  • 1995 WL 1704

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that only a person injured by the terms of a judgment is entitled to appeal
  • explaining that “because of the possibility that the legal theory of the underlying suit may change, a conclusion that the insurer need not defend does not imply that it need not indemnify”
  • finding the duty to indemnify is unripe until the insured has been held liable
  • “Illinois treats arguments about the duty to indemnify as unripe until the insured has been held liable.”
  • ex- plaining that a litigant “who cannot show how the judgment in- jured [him] in a way the court of appeals can correct, [is] not [a] proper appellant[]”
  • “The duty to indemnify is unripe until the insured has been held liable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Easterbrook, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.