· 8/23/1967
Grinnell Corporation v. American Monorail Company
Citations
- 285 F. Supp. 219
- 158 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 129
- 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11250
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It is abundantly evident from the file history of the . . . patent that the application was subjected to rigorous examination. . . . Thus[,] the . . . application is entitled fully to the presumption of validity accorded by the statute . . . .”
- “It is abundantly evident from the file history of the . . . patent that the application was subjected to rigorous examination. . . . Thus[,] the . . . application is entitled fully to the presumption of validity accorded by the statute . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hemphill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.