Skip to main content
· 8/23/1967

Grinnell Corporation v. American Monorail Company

Citations

  • 285 F. Supp. 219
  • 158 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 129
  • 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11250

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is abundantly evident from the file history of the . . . patent that the application was subjected to rigorous examination. . . . Thus[,] the . . . application is entitled fully to the presumption of validity accorded by the statute . . . .”
  • “It is abundantly evident from the file history of the . . . patent that the application was subjected to rigorous examination. . . . Thus[,] the . . . application is entitled fully to the presumption of validity accorded by the statute . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hemphill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.