Gring v. Ives
Citations
- 222 U.S. 365
- 32 S. Ct. 167
- 56 L. Ed. 235
- 1912 U.S. LEXIS 2187
Syllabus
<p>The act of March 3,1899, c. 425, § 10, 30 Stat. 1121,1151, authorizing establishment of harbor lines was not intended, and did not operate, to paralyze all state power concerning structures of every character in navigable waters within, their borders, or to automatically destroy property rights previously acquired under sanction of state authority. . Cummings v. Chicago, 188 U. S. 410.</p> <p>In this case the Federal question relied upon is so absolutely without merit, and the grounds are so frivolous, as not to afford a basis for exercise of jurisdiction, and the writ of error is dismissed.</p> <p>Writ of error to review 150 Nor.. Car. 137, dismissed.</p>
Judges: White
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.