District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/1/2006
Grimsley v. State
Citations
- 939 So. 2d 123
- 2006 WL 2519579
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that it was “precluded from reviewing” a possible fundamental error “because it was not raised on appeal”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stringer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- I.R.C. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-15· cited 33×
- State v. OuelletteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2012-01-31· cited 26×
- Michel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-07-30· cited 17×
- Grimsley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-11-16· cited 5×
- Mordenti v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-02-22· cited 2×
- IRC v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-15
- Roger N. Rosier v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-06-28
- Tramel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-02-16
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Zuniga v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-31· cited 35×
- York v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-21· cited 13×
- Mathews v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-27· cited 9×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-24· cited 9×
- Caruthers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-10-28· cited 8×
- Houston v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-11-23· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.