Skip to main content
· 12/21/1990

Grimshaw v. Schwegel

Citations

  • 572 So. 2d 12
  • 1990 WL 211493

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding privilege applied where the opposite party sought to “discover” privileged work product that the other party’s expert relied on during a deposition
  • report by petitioner’s expert witness which was generated during the presuit screening process of petitioner’s case was privileged and thus exempt from discovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.