Grimminger v. Alderton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the circuit court's truth-seeking language in its jury instruction did not constitute reversible error because the instruction as a whole included at least twenty references to the State's burden of proof
• affirming conviction when \the circuit court referenced the 'beyond a reasonable doubt' standard at least twenty times during its instructions\ and used a \robe of righteousness\ simile
• finding—upon review of the entire charge—no reversible error despite the trial court's truth-seeking jury instruction, observing the trial court's instructions referenced the \beyond a reasonable doubt\ standard at least twenty times

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).