Grimmer v. Lord Day & Lord

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• employer who failed to set fourth brief statement explaining why shortened notice period was necessary is liable under Act for full 60 days’ damages even though notice otherwise complied with WARN
• “this [good faith] defense does not provide a basis for denying this motion.”
• exception not applicable where “notice stated only that ‘[t]he Firm was not able to give greater advance notice of this termination since this termination arises from unforeseeable business circumstances’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).