Grimm v. Tittman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, because piercing the corporate veil is an equitable remedy, district court lacked authority to grant that remedy regardless of whether it had jurisdiction over the underlying contract case
• holding that, because piercing the corporate veil is an equitable remedy, district court lacked authority to grant that remedy regardless of whether it had jurisdiction over the underlying contract case
• ruling that, although the district court had jurisdiction over the underlying contract case, the court lacked authority to grant the remedy of piercing the corporate veil because that remedy is an equitable remedy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).