Connecticut Appellate Court· 12/31/2002
Grimm v. Grimm
Citations
- 74 Conn. App. 406
- 812 A.2d 152
- 2002 Conn. App. LEXIS 656
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- testimony of plaintiff, no matter how brief, on day assigned for trial sufficient
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bishop
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Melendez v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-04-09· cited 18×
- Grimm v. GrimmConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-03-16· cited 12×
- State v. WalczykConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-04-08· cited 9×
- Kendall v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2015-12-22
- Grimm v. GrimmSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-04-10
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sicaras v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-04-22· cited 76×
- Nielsen v. NielsenConnecticut Appellate Court· 1985-05-07· cited 61×
- Marshall v. MarshallConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-08-13· cited 17×
- Smith v. ReynoldsConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-08-03· cited 8×
- Brown v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-04-16· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.