Grimes v. Canadian American Transportation, C.A.T. (U.S.), Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that jurisdiction in federal court is proper where plaintiff filed claim of sexual harassment with EEOC and checked appropriate box for state agency to investigate and VCHR declined
• finding that a filing with the EEOC is “a sufficient filing with the [VOCR]”
• relying on a precursor of the provision in § 2.2- 3902 to hold, in the context of a sexual discrimination claim, that “[t]he VHRA essentially makes any federal violation a violation of Virginia law as well”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).