Skip to main content
· 6/22/2004

Grillette v. Warden, Winn Correctional Center

Citations

  • 372 F.3d 765
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 12250
  • 2004 WL 1243082

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Melancon’s application was “in an untimely status” due to his failure to seek or obtain an extension within the 30-day period
  • rejecting argument that, “because Grillette, like Melancon, never requested an extended return date, he could not have obtained an extension” under Rule 4- 3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garwood, Jones, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.