Skip to main content
· 5/6/1992

Grill v. Hunt

Citations

  • 6 Cal. App. 4th 73
  • 7 Cal. Rptr. 2d 768
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 6149
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3926
  • 1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 591

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The rule in California seems clear that following rescission of a contract, the burden of proving entitlement to restitution or offset is on the defaulting party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wiener

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.