Grigsby v. Hubbard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding “[t]he factual 5 record of the case—which consist[ed] solely of the complaint—d[id] not establish what the 6 competing social interests” were
• violation of California constitutional right of privacy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).